Professional Development

The term ‘emergent language’ has recently gained significant traction in ELT circles. This ELTABB workshop aimed to help teachers understand and manage the unpredictable language that can arise spontaneously in the classroom. We also explored practical tools to address such language confidently in the moment.

Workshop Part 1: Capture it, shape it, reflect on it…

The Loop Approach

Originally developed by Tessa Woodward, the ‘Loop Approach’ is a cycle whereby teachers go through the steps of learning exactly what they will be helping their own learners to do. By experiencing the process themselves and going through each stage in a so-called loop, they encounter potential blocks along the way and work together to solve them. Afterward, they reflect and feed their insights back into their own teaching practice.
My experiments with this approach in my own Emergent Language Toolkit CPD course have led me to design workshops that also follow its structure.

First off: Pack the suitcase!

The workshop started with my own version of Tony Wright & Rod Bolitho’s suitcase activity, which I had adapted into the PACT Suitcase Activity:

PACT is an acronym which stands for four simple prompts:

• Place
• Activity
• Conversation
• Thought

These prompts encourage learners (or workshops participants) to think about moments, stories, anecdotes and other relevant information from their recent day-to-day lives that they are interested in sharing with each other in breakout rooms.

Collecting the pieces

The teacher’s job then is to collect pieces of language that are emerging. Of course, the workshop participants were all proficient English speakers. Still, the effect was essentially the same; spontaneous and unplanned language that was being expressed to meet a communicative, meaning-focused need.

These bits of language included chunks, collocations, pieces of functional language (such as clarification requests, offers, agreements) and all sorts of other language, which I collected on an interactive whiteboard as the participants were deep in conversation.

This kind of natural communicative task of course needed to have a clear outcome to make it meaningful: participants had to report back one interesting thing they had found out about their partner and give their partner’s anecdote or story a headline. This meant that they were on task and producing natural streams of language, just as a learner would.

Organising the findings

As the participants filtered back into the main group, I showed them the Flingaboard which I’d been using to collect the utterances and bits of language that had been generated in their conversation.
For those unfamiliar with it, Flingaboard is a free, collaborative whiteboard tool that can be used for collecting, organising and sharing language. It works particularly well with working with language learners online. It’s free to access, requires no sign-ups or logins and allows everyone to work collaboratively (and creatively!) on the same board.

We used the Flingaboard as a canvas for participants to organise the pieces of language into groups. While this sorting activity may appear very simple on the surface, it is working at a deeper cognitive level, challenging participants to come up with, justify and explain their reasoning to each other. In doing so, they also need to use a great deal of functional language, all of which can be useful to notice and work with in the language classroom.

Feedback and insights

When the participants fed back on the task and explained the different types of groupings they had come up with for the language that had emerged from the first activity, they also noticed how much incidental language had emerged during the sorting process itself. Through the experiential loop, they recognised that this language could itself provide useful additional material to work with in their own classrooms.

Just as in the Emergent Language Toolkit course and in the Reactive Teaching Practice workshops that I deliver, reflection is an integral part of the learning process and of the learning loop. We therefore closed the first half of the session by reflecting on our initial takeaways, the experience of using the whiteboard to categorise and sort language, and how this could be transferred to our own language learners.

We also surfaced interesting reflections regarding the value of giving learners a cognitive challenge without necessarily having right or wrong answers. This gives learners a sense of autonomy: they are able to make decisions and explain and justify their own answers while still working meaningfully with the language that has emerged. Of course, in the language classroom there will also be upgrades, reformulations and gaps for learners to notice between what they originally uttered and what was subsequently written on the Flingaboard.

The reflection session also prompted explorations of further options of working with this emergent language creatively. By putting some language onto the flingboard in its original, uncorrected form, it could potentially allow learners to work with it, manipulate it and help each other to improve or expand it.

Workshop Part 2: Use it…meaningfully!

Moving into the second part of the workshop, having captured and shaped the language, we then aimed to use and exploit what had already emerged through a number of creative tools from the Emergent Language Toolkit.
I showed participants different possible tools, including the Wonders of Street View and Story Dice. They were tasked with choosing one of these activities and then going away and creatively using some of the language they had collected and categorised from the first task in a productive activity.
Importantly, the task design also meant that they were creating something meaningful to share with the other group afterward.

All groups chose the ‘Wonders of Street View’ task from the toolkit task options:

The importance of task design when working with emergent language can’t be underestimated: creating a meaningful gap between learners makes the need to communicate authentic.
As such, the participants had the freedom to choose images from the image bank and then created dialogues, headlines and captions for each using some of the emergent language on the Flingaboard from the initial activity. Reporting back to the main group, the groups had to match the captions to the images with a lot of meaningful communication and much laughter ensuing!

Takeaways and participant reflections

We closed the workshop, and indeed the reflective loop, by taking stock of how this kind of activity and design could support learners and promote learner autonomy.
The main takeaways from the workshop were:

• Categorising and sorting tasks for emergent language help learners engage with and process language more deeply.
• Choice and differentiation: Rather than imposing rigid task requirements, we might ask learners to choose between three and five pieces of (emergent) language to incorporate, choose which task to complete, or otherwise give them flexibility in terms of how they complete a task.
• Functional language as a key area: The categorising and sorting tasks in particular prompted the use of a lot of interactional functional language – agreeing, disagreeing, hedging, negotiating, offering, requesting and such more.
• Giving learners choice in the classroom also gives them a sense of agency to self-direct learning.

Final thoughts

This last reflection revealed something which I think is food for thought for any teacher who wants to work more meaningfully with learner-generated (emergent) language:

Letting the learners lead and helping them at the point of need is a skill worth developing. Honing this awareness can be a great help to teachers in making more judicious, on-the-spot decisions.
When learners have the opportunity to select language and negotiate and co-construct meaning with it, they are far more likely to engage in deeper processing of language.

As Alison King stated, teachers who make more informed decisions as to when they play the role of ‘the sage on the stage’ and when they relinquish control to be more ‘the guide on the side’ can give learners much more agency in their own learning.

***

Links

Emergent Language Toolkit Professional Development Course: https://wordsmitheryelt.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lewis-jaquest-emergent-language-teaching/
The Wonders of Street View: https://neal.fun/wonders-of-street-view/
Story Dice: davebirss.com/storydice/index.html
Flingaboard: https://flinga.fi/

References and further reading

Wright, T. and Bolitho, R. (2007) Trainer Development. Lulu.com.

Woodward, T. (1988) Loop-input: A set of strategies designed to help language teacher trainers and teachers’ self-help groups to add variety to training sessions. Canterbury: Pilgrims.

King, A. (1993) ‘From Sage on the Stage to Guide on the Side’, College Teaching, 41(1), pp. 30–35.

Have you ever wondered why some lessons spark real thinking and others drift into passive listening? This article reveals two practical frameworks that can turn classroom energy into lasting learning. Discover how to design lessons that help students think and feel differently by the end.

Think about the most memorable lesson you’ve ever attended. As a teacher or as a learner. What made it stick?

It probably wasn’t the slides. It wasn’t the volume of content covered. Chances are, it was how it felt to be in the room. The moment the trainer asked you to do something: to talk to someone, to make a decision or draw something unexpected. The moment the energy shifted and you stopped just receiving information and started actually thinking.

That question opened the workshop I delivered for ELTAU in May 2026. And the responses in the chat told the whole story. Words like “energetic, storytelling, images, hands-on activities!” This set the scene perfectly for the workshop ahead.

The problem with content-first lesson design

Most of us were taught to design lessons by starting with content. What do the students need to know? Which grammar point are we covering? What vocabulary should they leave with?
More often than not, the result is a lesson structured around delivery. The teacher talks. The students listen. There might be a task at the end. But the learning happens in one direction, from the front of the room outward, and a significant amount of it doesn’t land.

A significant amount of it doesn’t land.

It’s not a knowledge problem. It’s a design problem.
When we understand how the brain actually processes and retains information, we start making different choices. Not bigger choices or harder choices. Small, practical ones that shift where the thinking happens in the room.

Framework One: 6 Principles to Make It Stick

Training from the Back of the Room (TBR) is a methodology developed by Sharon Bowman, grounded in six brain-based learning principles. Each one reflects something we know about how people take in and retain new information. Together, they offer a practical lens for redesigning any lesson, regardless of topic, level or format.
Here’s a brief overview of each principle, with a practical application for English language teaching.

Framework Two: The 4Cs Map

Alongside the six principles, the session introduced a lesson design tool called the 4Cs Map. It offers a brain-friendly structure for planning any lesson or workshop:

• C1 Connections: Start by connecting learners to each other and to the topic. What do they already know? What do they want to find out? This is where you create psychological safety and activate prior knowledge.
• C2 Concepts: Introduce new content in short bursts of ten to twenty minutes, followed by a brief activity to consolidate understanding. This is not a lecture phase. It is a guided exploration with frequent check-ins.
• C3 Concrete Practice: Learners actively apply what they’ve learned. This is where real understanding gets tested and built. Role plays, peer teaching, card sorts, problem-solving tasks. The activity depends on your content. The principle stays the same.
• C4 Conclusions: Give learners time to reflect, summarise and commit to action. A learning log, a top takeaway exercise, or a “Wow and How About” reflection prompt all work well here. The conclusion is not a wrap-up. It is the moment learning moves from the session into long-term memory.

In the workshop, participants used the 4Cs Map to begin designing a lesson of their own in real time, filling in each quadrant as we explored the tools available for each phase. Several teachers shared their plans in the final breakout discussion, and the variety and quality of what they produced in under forty minutes was striking.
That is the shift these frameworks invite. Not a complete overhaul of what you teach, but a rethink of how you design the conditions for learning.

Final thoughts on the frameworks

The six learning principles and the 4Cs Map are not complicated. They don’t require expensive tools or a complete redesign of your materials. What they require is a shift in starting point.
Instead of asking, “What do I need to cover?”, start with, “What do I want my students to be able to do, think or feel differently by the end of this lesson?” That question changes everything that follows.

“What do I want my students to be able to do, think or feel differently by the end of this lesson?”

English language teachers are already skilled communicators and relationship builders. These frameworks give that skill a structure. They move the pressure off you and onto the group, where the learning actually happens.
And don’t just take my word for it, feedback from the session included:

“The 4C’s are an excellent tool for planning and structuring a lesson.” – Markus
“Love the structure and variety – it’s a real mix and match.” – Brigid
“I really liked the facilitation cards that were used throughout the session – I liked that it had a beginning, middle and end. I loved the whole session.” – Vivian

Want to explore further?

If this article has sparked your curiosity, there are three ways to go deeper.
The Unforgettable Facilitation online taster workshop is a practical introduction to the six principles and how to apply them in your own sessions. It runs periodically online and is suitable for teachers, trainers and facilitators at any level. If you missed the workshop, and want to experience them yourself, sign up here.
The Facilitation power hours are 1-2-1 opportunities to create a 4C’s map together on a session you plan together, exploring the principles and the tools that would suit your session plan. Book your slot here.

The next public Training from the Back of the Room Practitioner Course takes place on 19 and 20 November 2026 in London. Over two days, you’ll experience the full methodology, earn a globally recognised practitioner certificate, and leave with a complete session plan built around your own content. Sign up here or express your interest here for bringing TBR to Germany.
You can find further details at Linktree or by connecting with Rachelle Williams on LinkedIn.

***

If you enjoyed this article, you may also like:

Boost your Online Teaching with Brain-Friendly Slides – Here’s How – Connections

Not Just “What” But “How”: Empower Your Learners With Effective Learning Strategies – Connections

Workshop Review: “SMART PRACTICE – Using Cognitive Science and Coaching Tools to make Learning Stick” with Marcela Harrisberger – Connections

Title image by: Manfred Steger, Unsplash

Evan Frendo’s January talk from the “Innovative Teaching Series” at Arden University explored the difference between classroom and corporate settings, as well as the changing landscape of learning and teaching English in an increasingly digitalised and AI-enhanced world.

Corporate priorities

Evan began by noting that language learning is often put on the back burner in corporate contexts. Companies usually place more value on compliance and performance:

English functions as a Business Lingua Franca to communicate and get things done, without interrupting workflows. Learning has to fit that reality (aka LIFOW — Learning In The Flow Of Work).

This marks a shift away from traditional models toward more flexible approaches. Learning can range from intentional, structured courses to incidental language use integrated into daily work tasks. Evan elaborated on this, explaining the different types of learning.

Formal and informal types of learning: learners on the spectrum

We discussed the spectrum of formal and informal learning that learners navigate:

On the formal end, there are “traditional” approaches: these are proactive and intentional. Doing a course, learning specific target language or practising key skills are all formal approaches.

On the informal end, there is learning simply through use of language. There is no intention to learn at all – it is simply a byproduct of using the language in everyday life.

In between, on the more formal side, there is explicit learning – being aware of what comes up and practising useful language as needs emerge.

In contrast to that, incidental learning, which means noting something in passing, is a more informal way of learning.

Evan’s main point was that the traditional teacher-centred approach of learning English is making space for more informal and learner-centred ways of learning. One of the reasons for this, besides LIFOW, is the fact that corporate learners have their own communities of practice.

Learners use specific vocabulary at work (their “company speak”). That means that their own experience is often more useful than traditional classroom knowledge. So their learning process is naturally more pragmatic, which lends itself to the task-based approach.

Task-based learning: learning by doing

Evan presented task-based learning as a hands-on way to foster the DIY-mindset in teaching. It has the double benefit of using the target language in a task-related context, so it combines learning and getting real-life work done. At the same time, it is innovative in the sense that there is no prediction of specific language outcomes: the language used will reflect the needs of the learners.

The process follows these steps:

• Needs analysis/identify task
• Task
• Language feedback
• Task feedback
• Repeat task

For this, the trainer engages in on-the-job shadowing, becoming a mentor who reviews activities and encourages reflection. The trainer also guides the process by directing the team and asking questions like “What have you learned?”, which leads learners through an iterative process.

As a result, the teacher’s role shifts from language specialist/walking dictionary to mentor and moderator.
This hands-on approach also reflects broader changes in how teaching and learning are structured.

A new trend: IDLE

While the traditional way of teaching is all about formal teacher-and-book-centred courses, IDLE stands for the highly personalised experience of using digital tools to learn, no teacher required.

Informal Digital Learning of English is:

– just-in-time/delivered as needed
– bite-sized
– accessible
– relevant
– personalised
– integrated into performance.

For some time now, there has been a shift from publisher-led (following coursebooks) to teacher-led (with the teacher combining and editing resources) to student-led (i.e. students designing and curating their learning process in accordance with their needs).

But this is not the only shift that has been occurring:

Enter AI

The biggest recent shift has been the introduction of AI assistants, which can take on most office tasks, such as:

• writing emails
• creating presentations and reports
• visualising workflows, etc.

Newer versions go a step further: they can imitate writing styles (thus helping assistants write in the manager’s name), or provide real-time translation of online team meetings in any language.

As a result, there’s no longer a pressing need to learn a language in order to write emails or understand what’s happening in a meeting. AI can shoulder most of that, saving the company time and money.

However, Evan explained that while AI is good at collecting queries and responses from users, it’s far less effective at evaluating output. As its core function is predicting linguistic patterns, it lacks metacognition and real-life experience – it simply has access to a giant database.
Therefore, it still needs to be monitored by humans to prevent malfunctions and inconsistencies.

The person analysing AI is also called the “human in the loop”, overseeing the process and curating output.

What do these shifts mean for teachers?

As recent trends shift away from traditional teaching toward learner autonomy and increasing digitalisation, how is the role of the teacher changing?

The role of the teacher is rapidly evolving into that of​ a co-explorer and curator, rather than the sole source of knowledge. Evan predicted that while AI won’t replace teachers as a whole, it might replace those who aren’t AI-savvy.

His advice to teachers was to keep up with the times: to embrace AI to learn to work with it effectively, and to see themselves as “teachers in the loop.”

In a nutshell, teachers should act as learning consultants: counselling, guiding, and supporting the learning process while regularly checking in with their students to ensure they remain on track.

***

If you enjoyed this article, you might also be interested in:

From Tool to Collaborator – How to Turn AI into Your Personal Teaching Assistant – Connections

We’re better able to excel as teachers when we take care of our own wellbeing first. But what exactly is it, and what small steps can we take to better support it? Christine Muir highlights simple ways to nurture teacher wellbeing for greater balance and fulfillment at work.

From anger to action

Think back to the height of the pandemic in 2020. It might be an unexpected initial prompt for an article on teacher wellbeing, but it’s the start of my story. A phrase that’s stuck with me since is the following: while we all found ourselves in the same storm, we were all in very different boats.

For some, experiences of lockdowns, social distancing, professional and social moves online, furloughs from work – all offered some net positives for wellbeing. For many others, the opposite was true. Certainly, this was sadly the case for many teachers.

There had already been a growing focus on ELT teacher wellbeing for many years before the pandemic. For me, though, it was the pandemic that catalysed my professional relationship with it. My frustrations grew to anger, which ultimately tipped over into action. Whose responsibility was it to protect teachers’ wellbeing?

Furthermore, what actually is wellbeing? How could I better support my colleagues and students? Was there also agency to support my own wellbeing that I was leaving on the table?

What exactly is wellbeing?

As a field of study, positive psychology is interested in understanding how we thrive.

Interest in wellbeing and what it means to live well extends back far beyond the modern concept’s inception – think, for example, back to philosophers Aristotle and Epicurus in Ancient Greece.

Historically, there have been two main approaches to understanding wellbeing:

1) Hedonic wellbeing focuses on our experiences of happiness and pleasure. For example, we might experience hedonic wellbeing during a fun lesson with a student or when enjoying a networking event with peers.
2) Eudaimonic wellbeing taps into something deeper. We experience it for example when we feel like we’re growing as a teacher or leader, developing our skills or finding new purpose in our work.

Wellbeing is multidimensional. Both hedonic and eudaimonic wellbeing are important.

Stop and think: When did you last experience hedonic and/or eudaimonic wellbeing at work?
What were you doing?
Did it feel like a rare/common experience?
How did it affect the rest of your lesson/the rest of your day?

Martin Seligman’s PERMA model of wellbeing

Martin Seligman’s PERMA model of wellbeing had the most meaningful initial impact on me in terms of increasing my own wellbeing literacy. That is, to answer the question of how I can better understand, assess and ultimately support my professional wellbeing.
It combines both hedonic and eudaimonic aspects:

P = positive emotions – joy, gratitude, hope, pride…
E = engagement – when we can get fully ‘stuck into’ challenging tasks, drawing on all our skills, strengths and attention
R = relationships – with other teachers, students, and outside of work
M = meaning – serving something bigger than ourselves
A = accomplishment – feeling competent and recognised for it
V = vitality (or PERMA+) – a later addition, our physical wellbeing is part of the same picture!

Read more about Martin Seligman and the work of the Positive Psychology Centre on their website.

Stop and think: Conduct a wellbeing health check-up

• What aspects of your wellbeing have been highest this week? Where has it been lowest?
• When has your wellbeing felt most stable over the past [month, year]?
• Where does your wellbeing currently feel most vulnerable?
• Choose one aspect of your wellbeing you want to focus on increasing over the coming week, month or year.

Do we have to wait for change?

There’s a short answer to this question: no!
Let’s not pretend that all challenges are within our control, nor that all those that are have quick fixes. But this doesn’t mean that we have zero agency.

Stop and think: What does your job cost you? What challenges are you currently facing? What resources do you have access to?

One way to increase the amount of agency we feel we have – and so the amount we’re able to enact – is by personalising a job demands-resources model. It’s exactly what it says on the tin. It pushes us to better articulate the demands of our professional role and the resources we can draw on.

1) Start by noting down all the demands that come with your job. Big or small, in/outside of your control, jot down everything that causes you stress.
2) Separate out your list into two columns, stressors that you have some power to influence, and those entirely outside of your control.
3) Where stressors are inside your control, consider what small, tangible changes may be possible.
4) List all potential job resources available to you. These are things that safeguard us against the demands of our job. They can be things that you’re already doing or things you’ve not tried, networks you’ve not yet tapped into.
5) Finally, think bigger picture and consider opportunities to expand your learning and professional development.

Find this activity (p. 21), and others like it, in Sarah Mercer and Tammy Gregersen’s book “Teacher Wellbeing”.

Consider also tagging on an extra step at the end. Use your reflections as an excuse to catch up with a friend over coffee – consider sharing your list of resources and asking them to add ideas you might have missed.

Even if you come away ‘only’ having had a lovely catch up and spoken nothing about work, from a wellbeing perspective, the time may nevertheless have been well spent!

Ringfencing time in busy professional (and personal) lives isn’t easy. But, as workshop participants fed back, these ‘deep conversations’ around ‘thought-provoking questions on wellbeing in our profession’ are invaluable: ‘These questions are at the heart of our working lives.’

Ask not only what you can do for your teachers’ association, but also what it can do for you

Another lasting impact of the pandemic has been increased visibility, acceptance and (in many contexts) respect for discourses around wellbeing. Earlier this year, I was honoured to be invited to give a keynote talk on teacher wellbeing at the 33rd AKS conference held at Ruhr Universität Bochum. My ELTABB workshop invitation was prompted by a suggestion from someone I met at this conference.

This raises an important question:

➡️ Whose responsibility is it to support our wellbeing? Is it ours? Our employers’? What important roles can teachers’ associations like ELTABB play? Where is the balance?

There’s no single answer. But I do know that increasing our wellbeing literacy – our understanding of what wellbeing actually is and how we can better support it – matters. It’s a critical starting point for us to be able to make meaningful positive change.

Return to your wellbeing health check up periodically and take note of the direction it’s trending. Take advantage of the CPD available. Attend the next Stammtisch.
ELTABB, alongside other teachers’ associations, play a vital role in bringing teachers together and in facilitating these conversations.

Thank you, again, for the invitation and the opportunity to participate in such thought-provoking discussion!

***

If you enjoyed this article, you might also be interested in:

Learner Autonomy and Teacher Wellbeing: Flip Your Classroom and Achieve More by Doing Less – Connections

and

What I Wish I’d Known: 6 Tips for New English Teachers – Connections

Clear communication goes beyond perfect grammar: it means cutting through noise and confusion. Vicky Margari reveals how hidden issues like fear, habits, and digital overload can cloud understanding. She offers practical tools and small steps to help teams build lasting habits for better communication.

What if training wasn’t the same as transformation?

So many clients start with “I want to improve my grammar”.

I used to ask all the classic questions:
Why do you want to improve your English? What do you need to do with it?

Then I would tell my clients how to negotiate, run meetings, write emails. I would tell them how to use the present perfect and the conditionals. I would give them the phrasal verbs and all the good stuff. They would do well in sessions. Then they’d slip right back into old habits at work.

I kept wondering: am I not giving enough practice? Am I not explaining things well? Why isn’t this creating the change my clients hope to see and pay for? What if training wasn’t the same as real transformation? What was my value as a trainer?

Clear communication in teams: a multi-faceted challenge

It became clear that most communication problems at work aren’t only about language. There is so much more:

• misunderstandings
• assumptions
• digital overload
• unhelpful habits

Sometimes it’s the channel (Teams chat, email, Slack, etc.).
Often, it’s the story we keep telling ourselves (“I’m bad at this.” “They’ll think I’m stupid.”).
Perhaps even good old resistance to change.

I call all these barriers noise. And if I wanted real change in communication, I needed to find and cut the noise, not just teach the rules. I needed to sit down with my clients and look together at the whole communication ecosystem.

Visualise the noise

I use a simple model to help my clients see the noise. It is a basic map, inspired by communication theories and models, such as the Shannon-Weaver Communication Cycle model. It shows the sender, message, receiver, channel, and feedback loop. Noise can be anywhere: vague messages, cultural misunderstandings, the wrong channel or just digital clutter.

Find the noise: curiosity before solutions

When a client said “I want to improve my grammar,” I used to jump straight to solutions. Now, I slow down and ask:

• What does grammar mean for you in this case?
• What do you think happens when you make a mistake? Is that true? What else might be true?
• What would be different for you if you felt more confident? What would confidence look like for you in meetings/emails/Slack?

The answers go deeper than tenses or phrasal verbs. Maybe it’s fear of being judged, confusion about what’s expected, or not knowing how to use email and chat effectively. By asking, not assuming, we can spot the real noise.

💡 Tip: Before offering solutions, ask more questions. Then ask some more. Keep digging. You may find the biggest problem isn’t what the client said it was.

For more on coaching questions and practices, visit the ICF World Coaching blog.

Challenge the noise: small experiments, big impact

A tech team I worked with struggled with digital communication. Their team chat was full of short, unclear messages (“done”, “any update?”). Decisions got buried and nobody knew who was doing what, or where information could be found (spoiler: everywhere, all at once). They thought their English was the problem but what they really needed was clarity and shared habits.

After we found the noise, we picked one practical experiment for each type:

• Vague messages: write clear, specific updates, for example “draft sent to Anna yesterday – waiting for edits”.
• Missing owner/action: add who/what/when to every message, for example “Tom to send report by Friday EOD”.
• Buried decisions: summarise and pin key decisions in chat; log into a shared decisions doc.
• Overuse of chat: move detailed info to email/project board; use chat for brief checks/reminders.

It wasn’t that grammar or vocabulary didn’t matter. Of course, they did. But using simple, practical phrases in context helped the team communicate with more confidence and focus.
Sometimes, the smallest change (a new phrase, a summary, a clear owner) done together makes the biggest difference. Small changes give quick wins and build trust that more is possible.

💡 Tip: Pick one visible, practical habit to challenge the noise. Small, specific changes beat grand solutions.

Tame the noise: sustaining change

Change doesn’t stick on its own. Habits return, and noise creeps back in when everyone gets busy. Real transformation happens when clients, teams and individuals, own the process for themselves.
Here’s how my tech client’s team made their new habits stick:

• Self-regulation: we designed individual checklists that everyone could keep handy and use.
• Accountability: peer reminders became normal. If someone slipped back, a colleague would gently nudge “Can we clarify who’s doing what?”
• Resources: a shared phrase bank made it easy to grab and adapt useful action statements and decision summaries.
• Reflection: they set aside 10 minutes each Friday for a team check: “What’s helping? Where are we slipping? What can we do better next week?”
• Celebration: whenever things went well with fewer follow-ups and less stress, they shared these small wins in the chat.

These routines, owned by the team, not me, made the changes feel natural. The new habits stuck. So did the confidence.

💡 Tip: For lasting change, help clients build routines for self-regulation, accountability, resources, reflection and celebration.

Final thoughts on clear communication for teams

I started out hoping for more. More impact, more real-world communication, more clients who felt like themselves at work in any language. Hope is not a strategy. But it can be the reason to take that first, small step toward real change.
If you want to help your clients cut the noise, start with curiosity. Try a small experiment. Help the client and team find the systems that make it stick.

***

If you enjoyed this read, you might also be interested in the following articles:

A helpful mindset for business English users

[Workshop Review: “Invisible Body Language” – Communicating in the Digital World with Sabrina Lucidi – Connections]